Legal Opinion
Connors v. Sowa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion “in the interests of justice and upon a showing of good cause” (22 NYCRR 202.17 [h]) in allowing plaintiffs treating physician to testify despite plaintiff’s failure to provide defendants with a medical report from him. Defendants had been provided with the report of plaintiffs treating physician to the no-fault insurance carrier, as well as his medical records and the records of all other physicians upon which he relied. Defendants conducted two physical examinations of plaintiff and did…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDougald v. GarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Serpe v. Eyris Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Freeman v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- McDougald v. GarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kelly v. TarnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atkinson v. Golub Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Carpenter v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Conroe v. Barmore-Sellstrom, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ross v. Northeast Diversification, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024