Legal Opinion

State v. Malunda

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 2013No. COA13-372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

John Kwame Malunda, III, (“defendant”) appeals from his conviction for possession of cocaine on the ground that the trial court erred in *356denying his motion to suppress evidence found on his person. For the foflowing reasons, we reverse.

I. Background

Defendant was arrested on 5 April 2012 and indicted by a Wake County Grand Jury on 6 August 2012 for possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine. Prior to defendant’s case being called for trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence seized during what he alleged was an illegal warrantless search of his person.

Defenda…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PigfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. StollingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  5. State v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API