Kleckner v. Kleckner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 291, Jan. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Union Co., Sept. T., 1902, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of Angeline C. Kleckner v. William M. Kleckner. Bill in equity for the rescission and cancellation of a deed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 291, Jan. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Union Co., Sept. T., 1902, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of Angeline C. Kleckner v. William M. Kleckner. Bill in equity for the rescission and cancellation of a deed. Before McClure, P. J. From the record it appeared that on August 13, 1901, Angeline C. Kleckner, the mother'of defendant, conveyed to the latter certain real estate by deed which contained the following covenant: “ The said party of the second part for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, in consideration of the premises, hereby…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The bill seeks the rescission and cancellation of a deed made by the complainant to her son, on the ground that it was obtained by fraud. The question of fraud is the only one in the case. The evidence was very full on the whole transaction, the judge had it all before him and he found against the complainant. It would serve no useful purpose to review the evidence in detail. It is sufficient to say that we are satisfied witji the learned judge’s view of the facts and we affirm the decree on his conclusions of law.
Decree affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Rutter v. RutterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Vaughn v. VaughnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Beyl v. Berger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1922