Legal Opinion

(HC) Perez v. Parker

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 19, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03469Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LISA MARIE PEREZ, No. 2:24-cv-3469-CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 LAVELLE PARKER, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 19

2254 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Examination of the in forma 20 pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
Patrick Neiss v. Pete BludworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.