Legal Opinion

Kephart v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1948No. 47363PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

The defendant’s motion for a new trial is based upon two grounds, first, the court erred in holding that plaintiff, as an employee of the Federal Government, had a right to sue the United States for benefits to which he was allegedly entitled under Public Resolution No. 96, approved August 27, 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 401 et seq., as amended by the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308; second, that it was error to decide plaintiff was entitled to recover.

Defendant again calls the attention of the court to the cases of Insular Police…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Insular Police Commission v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  2. Strong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  3. Ballf v. KranzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Danford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  5. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Gilman J. Chasse v. Robert E. ChasenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. Northern Indian Housing & Development Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Gilman J. Chasse v. Robert E. ChasenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. McEachern v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API