Gaulden v. Pilot Life Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.
The sole question posed for decision on this appeal is whether or not the court below committed error in concluding as a matter of law, upon the facts stipulated and the terms and provisions of the policy of insurance involved, that the plaintiff is entitled to recover only $2,000, rather than $4,000 for which she brought her action.
The provisions in the group policy bearing on the question under consideration are as follows:
“All persons directly employed on a full-time basis and compensated for services by the Policyholder may be insured under this policy.
Eligibility
“Each person described in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bailey v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Stanback v. Winston Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Bailey v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Duke v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Daniels v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981