Legal Opinion

Gaulden v. Pilot Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1957No. 603PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.

The sole question posed for decision on this appeal is whether or not the court below committed error in concluding as a matter of law, upon the facts stipulated and the terms and provisions of the policy of insurance involved, that the plaintiff is entitled to recover only $2,000, rather than $4,000 for which she brought her action.

The provisions in the group policy bearing on the question under consideration are as follows:

“All persons directly employed on a full-time basis and compensated for services by the Policyholder may be insured under this policy.

Eligibility

“Each person described in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Stanback v. Winston Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Bailey v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Duke v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Daniels v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API