Legal Opinion

Poutra v. Sapp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1915No. 6968. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Harris County; A. R. Hamblen, Special Judge. Action by E. E. Sapp and another against Joseph Poutra. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMEANS, J.

E. E. Sapp and H. B. Sapp, plaintiffs, brought this suit against Joseph Poutra, defendant, for damages alleged to have resulted to them by reason of misrepresentations of fact by defendant concerning the condition of a farm rented to them by Poutra. They alleged in their petition, substantially, that on the 10th day of January, 1911, Poutra, claiming that he was the owner of a tract of land, represented that the land was good clean land adapted to the cultivation of rice, and that it was free from any and all poisonous or obnoxious grasses that would render it unsuited for cultivation in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Passinger v. . ThorburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Van Wyck v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Barfield v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Lumber Co. v. C. R. Cummings Export Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Avery Co. of Texas v. Harrison Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. West Lumber Co. v. C. R. Cummings Export Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API