Legal Opinion

State v. Pace

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1994No. 24108PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review Petitioner’s (Pace) conviction for grand larceny as affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

We reverse.

FACTS

At trial, defense counsel asked Mr. Brown, a witness for the prosecution, “Do you have a criminal record?” The judge sus tained the prosecution’s objection, stating the question was “highly improper,” then sent the jury to its room.

In camera, the judge chastised defense counsel that such a broad question amounted to a “fishing expedition,” since counsel had no knowledge of any prior record against Mr. Brown. During his admonishment of counsel, the judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McGuireSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. PaceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. PassmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API