Legal Opinion

State v. Hoot

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal-from Blackhdwk District Court. — HoN. A. S. Blair, Judge. The indictment charges the defendant with an assault with intent to commit murder. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of ten years. From the judgment he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Bishop, O. J

—Defendant and his wife, Nettie Hoot, were married in January, 1899. After living together about a week, they separated, and Mrs. Hoot returned - to her home, at No. 337 Argyle street, in the city of Waterloo, this state. In May following, defendant returned to his wife at Waterloo, and together they started to make a trip down the Mississippi river, but it seems another disagreement arose, and within a few days Mrs. Hoot came. back to her home in Waterloo. The defendant visited.her there on August 10, remaining about an hour. He then went away, and did not return agiin. On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. People v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State v. CaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. State v. BrainardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. State v. KeaslingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LeedomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. People v. . SantoroNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. State v. BarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. State v. BunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API