Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Nielson's Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1995No. 15701PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
Worker appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) determining that Employer and its Insurer (Insurer), through their agent Crawford & Company, Health and Rehabilitation (Crawford), may have ex parte contact with Worker’s physicians outside the presence of Worker’s counsel. The order indicates that the constraints, limitations, and prohibitions set out in Church’s Fried Chicken No. 1010 v. Hanson, 114 N.M. 730, 845 P.2d 824 (Ct.App.1992), cert. denied, 114 N.M. 577, 844 P.2d 827 (1993), do not apply. We reverse.
Facts
Worker injured her neck, shoulder,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. IbarraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smith v. WalcottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Apodaca v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mosley v. TitusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Ramirez v. IBP Prepared FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Feynn v. St. Martin's Hospitality CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997