Legal Opinion

Boxwell v. Ladehoff

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1966No. A-10883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

Writ of error was granted in this venue case, but it is now our opinion that the application must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The suit was filed in the 108th District Court of Potter County by Howard E. Boxwell and Joe A. Allred, petitioners, against Donald Ladehoff, respondent. It is an action to enforce an alleged obligation in writing to deliver receipts from the sale of certain ensilage “to First National Bank at Amarillo, Texas.” Respondent’s plea of privilege to be sued in Oldham County, where he resides, was overruled by the trial court. The Court of Civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southwestern Investment Company v. ShipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. John Farrell Lumber Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Knudsen v. J. I. Case Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Ladehoff v. BoxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Wood v. John Farrell Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Investment Company v. ShipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Buckaloo Trucking Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API