Legal Opinion

Trackwell v. Irvin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1917No. 9,448PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Shelby Circuit Court; Alonso Blair, Judge. Exceptions by Thomas E. Trackwell, administrator of the estate-of Samantha J. Shoup, deceased, to the report filed by Maggie M. Irvin, as surviving partner of the firm of Shoup and Heck. From a finding approving the report and dismissing the exceptions, the administrator appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Ibach, P. J. —

For some years prior to her death Samantha J. Shoup was engaged in the business of propagating and selling goldfish with Maggie M. Irvin (formerly Maggie M. Heck) and Chester Heck under the firm name of Shoup and Heck.

1. Appellee, as surviving partner, filed her final report, ratified and consented to by her surviving copartner, of the partnership business, in which she charged herself with $593.58 and credited herself with the same amount. The statute evidently contemplates, where there are more than one surviving partner, that they join in the report. §9718 Burns 1914, §6052…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pitcher v. DoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Price v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. DerkesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. First National Bank v. Farmers & Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Urbanational Developers, Inc. v. Shamrock Engineering, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. McGivern v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Monarch Beverage Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
  4. Wilson v. DexterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Kelley, Glover & Vale, Inc. v. HeitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API