Legal Opinion

The Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co. v. Comprehensive Omnibus Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The defendant possesses a franchise to operate buses along Forty-ninth and Fiftieth streets from the east side to the west side. Pending the formal requirements preliminary to *879obtaining a franchise, the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New York has issued to the defendant a permit to extend the operation of its buses to the West Forty-second Street Ferry, along Eleventh and Twelfth avenues. The plaintiff operates a street surface railway, under a lawful franchise, whereby, through the Third Avenue Railway System, of which it is a part, it transports passengers to the same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Pumpyansky v. . KeatingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Brooklyn City Railroad v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company v. . WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Huff v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Kingsbridge Railway Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co. v. Comprehensive Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API