The Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co. v. Comprehensive Omnibus Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The defendant possesses a franchise to operate buses along Forty-ninth and Fiftieth streets from the east side to the west side. Pending the formal requirements preliminary to *879obtaining a franchise, the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New York has issued to the defendant a permit to extend the operation of its buses to the West Forty-second Street Ferry, along Eleventh and Twelfth avenues. The plaintiff operates a street surface railway, under a lawful franchise, whereby, through the Third Avenue Railway System, of which it is a part, it transports passengers to the same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Pumpyansky v. . KeatingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Brooklyn City Railroad v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- The Brooklyn City Railroad Company v. . WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Huff v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Kingsbridge Railway Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co. v. Comprehensive Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935