Legal Opinion

Fore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1986No. 72683PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Victor P. Fore appeals from his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391, enumerating as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the results of the intoximeter test administered to him after his arrest, and his motion for new trial.

Appellant contends that the results of the intoximeter test were inadmissible because the arresting officer did not advise him of his rights under the implied consent law, OCGA §§ 40-5-55 and 40-6-392, “at the time of arrest, or at a time as close in proximity to the instant of arrest as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Clapsaddle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. State v. HighsmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API