Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shaw v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 2010No. 5D07-3136Published

1DissentSawaya, J.

The majority erroneously eliminates a valuable contract provision that State Farm Fire and Casualty Company has every right to enforce against a claimant making a claim for PIP benefits; the majority fails to properly distinguish a condition precedent to recovery or suit that must be complied with by a claimant from a contract obligation that an assign-ee of benefits must otherwise agree to be bound by; the majority misinterprets section 627.736(6), Florida Statutes (2007), to require State Farm to obtain what is in essence a bill of discovery in order to receive information regarding the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API