Commonwealth v. Herb

¶ 1 Appellant, Thomas Herb, asks us to determine whether the evidence admitted at the de novo bench trial was sufficient to sustain his conviction for driving on a DUI-related license suspension. 1 Appellant also contends that the court erred by admitting his statements into evidence before the Commonwealth had established the corpus delicti of the crime of driving with a suspended license. We hold that the totality of the evidence admitted at trial was sufficient to sustain Appellant’s conviction. Further, we reject Appellant’s challenge to the admissibility of his statements at trial.…