United States v. Jones

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

We reject defendant’s contention, made in a mood of technicalism appropriate only to an era now fortunately past, that the indictment (set forth in the footnote) 1 did not sufficiently inform him of tT- nature of the crime charged. In the. alterna-’ tive, defendant complains that the indictment plainly shows that, if he committed a crime, lie did so solely in Oregon, not in the Western District of New Y oik. Wc assume, arguendo, the com cincos of this characterization of tin* indictment. On that basis, a timely objection pursuant to Article Til, § 2 of the Constitution…