Legal Opinion

Keatinge v. Biddle

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 21, 2002No. CIV. 99-321-P-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT AND/OR FOR NEW TRIAL

HORNBY, Chief Judge.

The defendants’ motion for new trial and their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are both Denied.

Upon certification of the question, the Law Court definitively rejected (as I did earlier) the defendants’ first line of defense — that there can never be an attorney-client relationship between the grant- or of a power of attorney and a lawyer engaged by the holder. The question that remains, then, is how it is to be determined whether any such relationship exists. Although…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. ManganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Larochelle v. HodsdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Keatinge v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Estate of Murray v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API