Legal Opinion

Walker v. Walker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Award, from Upson comity. Decided by Judge Cabiness, May Term, 1857. A suit in equity was commenced in the- Court below, and by consent of the parties, the matters in dispute were referred to arbitration, and two arbitrators, Washington Poe and Thomas 1’. Stubbs, appointed. These arbitrators made their award, to which exceptions were filed by the defendant in the suit.

Read the full summary

Award, from Upson comity. Decided by Judge Cabiness, May Term, 1857. A suit in equity was commenced in the- Court below, and by consent of the parties, the matters in dispute were referred to arbitration, and two arbitrators, Washington Poe and Thomas 1’. Stubbs, appointed. These arbitrators made their award, to which exceptions were filed by the defendant in the suit. Upon motion on behalf of the plaintiff, the defendant objecting, the award was entered on the minutes of the Court To which decision defendant excepted, tendered his bill of exceptions, which was signed and certified,'and cost…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

McDonald, J.

delivering the opinion.

This cause had been referred to arbitration by agreement of the parties, in writing. When the award was returned into Court, it was, on motion of complainant’s counsel, entered on the minutes of the Court, the defendant’s counsel *259opposing it. Defendant’s counsel excepted, to the decision of the Court. They made out and tendered a bill of exceptions, which was signed and certified by the presiding Judge. The defendants paid the cost and gave bond and security. Afterwards, complainant’s counsel moved the Court to enter the award of the arbitrators…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohran v. CarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. West v. Gainesville National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Culbreth v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API