Salmon v. Pearson & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Presiding Judge.
This case comes to us on the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In such a posture, as on consideration of the motion initially, “[t]he party opposing the motion ... is entitled to all favorable inferences and the benefit of every doubt, and the evidence is construed most strongly in [her] favor. [Cit.]” Dixieland Truck Brokers v. Intl. Indem. Co., 210 Ga. App. 160, 163 (2) (435 SE2d 520) (1993). “[A]t summary judgment a party who will not bear the burden of proof at trial. . . must demonstrate by reference to evidence in the record that there is an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Badische Corp. v. CaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Hardage v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Copeland v. Home Savings of America, F. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Benefit Support, Inc. v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Saffar v. Chrysler First Business Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Jackson v. CAMILLA TRADING POST, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Harmon v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Harmon v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.