Legal Opinion

Salmon v. Pearson & Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1994No. A94A0138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Presiding Judge.

This case comes to us on the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In such a posture, as on consideration of the motion initially, “[t]he party opposing the motion ... is entitled to all favorable inferences and the benefit of every doubt, and the evidence is construed most strongly in [her] favor. [Cit.]” Dixieland Truck Brokers v. Intl. Indem. Co., 210 Ga. App. 160, 163 (2) (435 SE2d 520) (1993). “[A]t summary judgment a party who will not bear the burden of proof at trial. . . must demonstrate by reference to evidence in the record that there is an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Badische Corp. v. CaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Hardage v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Copeland v. Home Savings of America, F. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Benefit Support, Inc. v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Saffar v. Chrysler First Business Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Jackson v. CAMILLA TRADING POST, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Harmon v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Harmon v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API