Legal Opinion
Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1967No. 40225PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Whether the appellant had authority to discontinue telephone service at complainant’s residence and at his restaurant depends upon what appellant’s tariff provisions provide. The tariff provision relied upon by appellant provides that:
“Where amounts due for exchange service are unpaid within twenty (20) days after the date of the monthly statement for exchange service, the telephone company may discontinue the service and remove its equipment from the subscriber’s premises.”
Nothing in the above-quoted tariff expressly gives the appellant authority to discontinue service at one location of a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morse v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Komisarek v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971