Legal Opinion

Wehrhane v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 15, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a pro forma decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City.

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

Adelheid Wehrhane, by her last will and testament, probated January 25th, 1892, directed that after the payment of her debts, all the residue of her estate should be divided into three equal parts, and for the purpose of effecting such division empowered her executors to sell and convey any part or all of her estate. One of these three equal parts she gave absolutely to her son Charles Wehrhane, and another part absolutely to her son William H. Wehrhane. The remaining third part'she gave to The Safe Deposit and Trust Company of Baltimore to be held and managed by said corporation, upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Tennison ex rel. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  2. Donalds v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  3. Randall v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Hinkley v. House of RefugeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Darrington v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Starr v. Minister & Trustees of the Starr Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  2. Mason v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. In Re Rogers' Trust EstateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  4. Madden v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Madden v. MERC.-SAFE DEP. & TR. CO.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API