Legal Opinion

Cowen v. Pressprich

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough' of Manhattan, first district, in favor of plaintiffs, after trial by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

Conversion, for the defendants’ alleged wrongful delivery of a bond. The parties on both sides are stock-exchange brokers. Plaintiffs had agreed to sell and deliver to defendants a bond of the Oregon Short Line Railroad, of the par value of $1,000. To fill that order plaintiffs ordered the bond from a third bond house arid the latter, by mistake, sent plaintiffs an Oregon and California Railroad bond, and plaintiffs, also by mistake, sent this Oregon and California bond to defendants. There is no controversy as to the manner of the sending. Plaintiffs handed the Oregon and California bond to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. . Ocean Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. McEntee v. . the New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Price v. . Oswego and Syracuse R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Jenkins v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Metzger v. Franklin BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dolitsky v. Dollar Savings BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  3. Cowen v. PressprichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API