Legal Opinion
Prospect High Income Fund v. Grant Thornton, LLP
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided October 18, 2006No. 05-05-00092-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FRANCIS.
Prospect High Income Fund (Prospect), ML CBO IV (Cayman), Ltd. (ML CBO), Pamco Cayman, Ltd. (Pamco), Pam Capital Funding, L.P. (Pam Capital), Highland Crusader Fund, Ltd. (Crusader), and PCMG Trading Partners VII, L.P. (PCMG) appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Grant Thornton, LLP. We affirm the judgment against Crusader and PCMG. We affirm the judgment as to the remaining appellants on their claims for negligence and third-party beneficiary breach of contract. We reverse and remand the remaining claims.
Appellants are bond and hedge funds…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- JSC Neftegas-Impex v. Citibank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Johnston v. Kruse, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.