Legal Opinion

Emil Horwitz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1965No. 246, Docket 29255PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought an action in the district court for the refund of a 100% penalty assessed and levied against him in the amount of $2,099.14 pursuant to Section 2707(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.1 *The district court found *878that the plaintiff was the sole active officer, as well as sole owner of the voting stock, of two corporations with retail sales operations in sixteen cities directed from a New York office; that he made all decisions as to payment of corporate bills, including tax liabilities, and that he willfully failed to pay over the income taxes and Federal Insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Harvey Veino v. John L. Fahs, Individually, and as Former Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Anthony Flan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Robert White v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. United States v. Joseph G. LeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. Ben D. Spivak and David S. Shapiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API