Ex Parte Allen
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.
The rule is now firmly established that, after a decree of divorce has been granted, and in it alimony payable monthly is provided, the court has the power and jurisdiction to modify the amount of the allowance at any time thereafter due to conditions which have changed since the entry of the decree. This is now held to be true whether the de- - cree granting divorce and awarding permanent alimony expressly reserve such jurisdiction or not. Epps v. Epps, 218 Ala. 667, 120 So. 150.
The petition here shows that the decree granting a divorce nnd fixing alimony at a monthly allowance did in fact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Epps v. EppsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Chilton v. GurganusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3Cited by19 opinions
- Worthington v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Bridges v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Borton v. BortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Le Maistre v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.