Stark v. State

The State appeals the granting of Brandon W. Stark's ("Movant's") Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.1 In three points, the State contends that the motion court clearly erred in: (1) granting Movant's *381claim for post-conviction relief because Movant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary in that the "motion court relied on an irrelevant factor and the record demonstrated that [Movant] was aware of the rights and privileges he was waiving[;]" (2) granting Movant's claim for post-conviction relief because Movant was properly advised of the range of punishment in that…