Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of the North Shore, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.
We are here confronted with the question of whether a village may by zoning ordinance establish fixed setback requirements applicable to religious institutional uses in an area zoned for residences. If such an invariable requirement is not permissible, then we must also decide whether, on the facts of this particular case, the setback requirement is sufficiently reasonable so that it may be applied to deny this plaintiff a variance. Finally, we are also required to decide whether the ordinances which set forth the bases upon which the requested special use permit is to be granted or denied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- MATTER OF CMTY. SYNAGOGUE v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of North Shore, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cornell University v. BagnardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Holy Spirit Ass'n v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Westchester Day School v. Village of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.