Legal Opinion

Sanctis v. Checco

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided December 29, 1960No. 1708 of 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, J.,

In this proceeding, defendant has petitioned the court to strike off, or, in the alternative, to open a judgment and to be let into a defense on the ground that at the time of service of the complaint in assumpsit by the sheriff upon defendant’s wife she was in poor health and failed to inform defendant of plaintiff’s cause of action. A rule to show cause was granted upon plaintiff. The undenied allegations in the pleadings established the following facts:

Edward J. Sanctis, plaintiff, is an excavating contractor. John Checco, defendant, is a general contractor and maintains his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Lance v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Strauss v. W. H. Strauss Co., Inc. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Myers v. Borough of South BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Federal Insurance v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanctis v. CheccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API