Legal Opinion

Bartles v. Livingston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 23, 1984No. 0103PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice:

This is an action for a deficiency j udgment by the holder of a second mortgage on real estate. The circuit court denied relief and the mortgagee appeals. We reverse and remand.

Lewis Bartles and Mark Livingston are medical doctors. In the spring of 1976 Livingston joined Bartles in his medical practice. Through Bartles, Livingston learned that one Benjamin McGraw, a business associate of Bartles, had decided to sell his house at Tega Cay in York County for $125,000.00. At that time the property was subject to two mortgages: a first mortgage to North Carolina National Bank…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Camden v. MayhewSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Dunkley v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  3. Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. BraunSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Berry v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Anderson v. PilgramSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Island Car Wash, Inc. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Southern Welding Works, Inc. v. K & S Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Ramage v. RamageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API