Legal Opinion

Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Courson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 9, 1925No. 7 Div. 543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff, Courson, sued the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company in an action of malicious prosecution. Verdict and judgment went for defendant, but, upon plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, a venire de novo was awarded by the court, and from that order this appeal is prosecuted according to the statute in such cases made and provided.

Defendant owned a mining camp at Acmar. Jim Herring occupied one of defendant’s houses under a written contract of lease, clauses of which read as follows:

“This lease is entered into by lessor because of the employment by lessor of lessee. * * * It is understood and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thousand Island Park Assn. v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Tutwiler Coal, Coke & Iron Co. v. TuvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Harris v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
  2. Hynes v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. American Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. Grant Building, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. NY ST. ENERGY R. & D. AUTH. v. Nuclear Fuel Serv.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
  5. State v. VincioniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API