Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Courson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Plaintiff, Courson, sued the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company in an action of malicious prosecution. Verdict and judgment went for defendant, but, upon plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, a venire de novo was awarded by the court, and from that order this appeal is prosecuted according to the statute in such cases made and provided.
Defendant owned a mining camp at Acmar. Jim Herring occupied one of defendant’s houses under a written contract of lease, clauses of which read as follows:
“This lease is entered into by lessor because of the employment by lessor of lessee. * * * It is understood and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thousand Island Park Assn. v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Tutwiler Coal, Coke & Iron Co. v. TuvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Harris v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Hynes v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- American Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. Grant Building, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- NY ST. ENERGY R. & D. AUTH. v. Nuclear Fuel Serv.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- State v. VincioniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925