Legal Opinion

Hawarden State Bank v. Hessler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Sioux District Court.— Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J.—

The plaintiff prayed for judgment on account of overdrafts in the sum of $607. The petition was aided by writ of attachment, and G. J. Shoemaker served thereunder as garnishee. From his answer, taken in open court, it appeared that the defendant Hessler, had conveyed a part of his property by bill of sale to Shoemaker and the remainder to the Hawarden Oreamery Association, with the understanding that the garnishee should reduce the property to money, and distribute it pro rata to the farmer patrons of the creamery, to whom Hessler was indebted. Shoemaker had received under this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richards v. BurdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Bean v. Barney, Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. Walker v. PumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Barton v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  5. Capital City Bank v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James E. Colliflower & Co. v. McCallum-Sauber Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API