Legal Opinion

Lake v. King

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881No. 1,077PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for maudamus before the Supreme Court. The facts are stated in. the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bj tlie Court,

Leonard, C. J. :

Bespondent is the acting and qualified judge of the second judicial district court in this state. At a prior date, Jane Lake commenced an action in said court against the petitioner, M. C. Lake, for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony, for a division of the alleged common property, and for the custody of a child of said Jane and M. C. Lake. Issues of fact were raised by petitioner in his answer, not only as to plaintiff’s allegations upon which she claimed a divorce and custody of the child, but also as to the amount and value of the common property. At the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LoganNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Perkins v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ormachea v. OrmacheaNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Lesh v. LeshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Repp v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Kapp v. KappNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Votaw v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API