Shuck v. Consolidation Coal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Giles Shuck seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901 et seq. (West 1986 & Supp.2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Shuck’s benefits.
I
Shuck worked for Consolidation Coal Company for forty-two years, nineteen years of which were underground and twenty-one years of which were above ground. For the last eight years of his employment…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Milburn Colliery Company v. Guy Hicks Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.