Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Zaiss

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 11, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

In Green v. Selznick (220 App. Div. 12), Presiding Justice Htjbbs, now of the Court of Appeals, writing for the unanimous court, said in part (at p. 14): “ Under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act a party to an action is entitled to an examination of his adversary before trial upon facts which are material and necessary to establish his cause of action or affirmative defense. Since the enactment of the Civil Practice Act the courts have repeatedly held that section 288 thereof should receive a liberal construction to the end that the involved technical practice followed under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MullinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. Oshinsky v. GumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. People Ex Rel. Lewis v. . FowlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Marine Trust Co. v. Nuway Devices, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Green v. SelznickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of AndriolaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of ChinskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re the Estate of DaleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API