Legal Opinion

Noble v. Bourke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Garnishment. Plaintiffs brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

January 7, 1880, the plaintiffs caused a summons to be issued from the Superior Court of. Detroit in their favor against Bates. At the same time they obtained a garnishee summons against Bourke and caused it to be served immediately. February 2d the garnishee made disclosure and admitted an indebtedness to Bates of $100. The first summons expired without any service on Bates, and on the 15th of March an alias summons was sued out, returnable June 1st. March 25th the court ordered the plaintiffs to show cause on the 27th why Bourke should not be discharged and allowed his fees as a witness and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peoples Lumber Co. v. StrehlkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Physicians & Dentists Service Bureau, Inc. v. LeslieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API