Legal Opinion

Paul v. Fortier

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 6, 1976No. 75-64-M. PPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

This petition for certiorari raises a novel and most interesting issue. Alfred A. Fortier and his son, the defendants in a Superior Court civil action which seeks to set aside a default judgment, by petitioning for certiorari have asked us whether the plaintiffs in that action, Henri Paul and his wife, can maintain such a suit when it was commenced more than a year after the entry of judgment and where at no point in their complaint do the Pauls ever claim that the default was the result of the Fortiers’ fraudulent conduct. We have issued the writ, the records of the Superior Court have been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. National Surety Co. v. State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Winfield Associates, Inc. v. W. L. StonecipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Bragg v. Warwick Shoppers World, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Inc. v. George E. Breece Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  2. Zaino v. ZainoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. Mansolillo v. Employee Retirement Board of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Reynaud v. KoszelaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. Waldeck v. Domenic Lombardi Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API