Lucas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner, an inmate of the State Department of Corrections, filed a petition for post-conviction relief and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This appeal is from the summary denial of that motion.
The petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis appears to be in proper form as required by Rule 32.6(a), A.R.Crim.P., as it is accompanied by a statement of his prison account. That statement shows that there has never been any more than $31.47 in the petitioner's account at any one time. The record shows that the forma pauperis motion was denied, but does not disclose the reason or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoppins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Hoppins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte Wyre, Jr., Cr-10-0773 (ala.crim.app. 5-27-2011)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Stafford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.