Gray v. State Ex Rel. Langham
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Jefferson. Tried below before Hon. Stephen P. West.
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Justice.
This was a quo warranta to try the title to the office of marshal of the city of Beaumont. The appellant. Dixon Gray, and the appellee, William A. Langham, were opposing candidates for that office at an election held on Tuesday, the 5th day of April, 1898. The returns of the election made by the officers of the election and canvassed by the city council showed that Gray had received 560 votes and that Langham had received 553 votes. Gray was declared elected, and thereupon qualified and entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office. The district attorney of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davis v. State ex rel. WrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- State Ex Rel. Barry v. ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Jennett v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Dean v. State Ex Rel. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ramsay v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Marks v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Pease v. State Ex Rel. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Sewell v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Peacock v. LathamSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.