George Colon & Co. v. East One Hundred & Eighty-ninth Street Building & Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, the Illinois Surety Company, from ah order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 14tli day of Hovember, 1910.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.: .
The defendant, Illinois Surety Company, appeals from an order denying its motion for leave to serve an amended answer.
The action is to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The appellant is made defendant by reason of its having given an undertaking to discharge the lien, and it alone is defending the action, the owner of the property having made default. The appellant’s original answer was practically a general denial. After the trial, before a referee, had proceeded for some time appellant was permitted, with the con*442sent of plaintiff, to amend' its answer so as to allege that the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. Hastings Terraces, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Abelman v. Indelli & Conforti Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re the Estate of GudeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Joseph F. Egan, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.