Legal Opinion
Sarne v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1952No. Appeals, Nos. 193 to 200 and Nos. 204 to 207PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
This case arose out of two actions in trespass tried at the same time, brought respectively by Frank Same *84and Walter C. Maddox, against five defendants. The defendants are the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter called the Railroad Company), Lee A. Hauser, an individual trading as Hauser Construction Company (hereinafter called Hauser), L. E. Winter Co., Inc. (Winter), Raymond Concrete Pile Company (Raymond), Domenic Rosati, Louis Rosati, James Rosati, Robert Rosati and Romolo Rosati, individually and as copartners in the firm of Rosati and Son…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Townsend v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Whitley v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Watson v. Zanotti Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Steele v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Harry W. Boettger v. The Babcock & Wilcox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.