Legal Opinion

Tursellino v. Paduano

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1951Published

1Opinion of the CourtBaar, J.

This is a motion by defendants to dismiss the complaint either pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice or for summary judgment under rule 113, or that the court pursuant to rule 212 in the exercise of its discretion refuse to take jurisdiction, and dismiss the complaint.

In a joint complaint wherein each of the two plaintiffs pleads an asserted cause of action against the City of New York and certain of its officials, a judgment is sought declaratory of rights and for incidental injunctive relief, based on the imposition of charges for the use of the defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Newburger v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Carson v. Brockton Sewerage CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API