Edmonson v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
Three years ago, the Department of Correctional Services revised its regulations governing prisoner disciplinary proceedings following litigation in the Federal courts. (See, Powell v Ward, 392 F Supp 628, mod 542 F2d 101; 487 F Supp 917, mod 643 F2d 924, cert denied 454 US 832.) Last year, our Court of Appeals resolved certain due process requirements concerning the hearing phase. (See, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130.)
Now, this court passes upon the validity of the prehearing period of detention in segregation of a prisoner under those…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Callender v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2012
- Stanback v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988