Austin v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Hardesty, J. :
In this appeal, we consider the qualifications required by NRS 176A.110 for the professional that conducts a psychosexual evaluation and renders the certification needed for probation of a defendant who is found guilty of felony statutory sexual seduction. The Legislature has prescribed a category of offenses that require evaluations and certifications to be provided by psychiatrists or psychologists for a defendant to be considered for probation. However, NRS 176A.110(1)(a) and NRS 176.139 make clear that for a defendant convicted of felony statutory sexual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parrish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. QuinnNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. STATE OF NEV. EMPLOYEES ASS'N, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goudge v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Blackburn v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Cabada Vs. Dist. Ct. (Richardson)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Rosie M. v. Ignacio A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022