Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2007No. 42999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Hardesty, J. :

In this appeal, we consider the qualifications required by NRS 176A.110 for the professional that conducts a psychosexual evaluation and renders the certification needed for probation of a defendant who is found guilty of felony statutory sexual seduction. The Legislature has prescribed a category of offenses that require evaluations and certifications to be provided by psychiatrists or psychologists for a defendant to be considered for probation. However, NRS 176A.110(1)(a) and NRS 176.139 make clear that for a defendant convicted of felony statutory sexual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. QuinnNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. STATE OF NEV. EMPLOYEES ASS'N, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goudge v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Blackburn v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Cabada Vs. Dist. Ct. (Richardson)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Rosie M. v. Ignacio A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API