Legal Opinion

Pool v. Clark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1944No. 4-7413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.

Appellant and appellee are neighbors, each farming land in the White River bottom in Durham township, Washington county, Arkansas. The running at large of cattle in this township was made unlawful by the provisions of Act 103 of the General Assembly of Arkansas of 1907, as amended by Act 273 of the General Assembly of Arkansas of 1909, put in effect by the voters at an election held in 1921. After his fence was damaged by a flood from the river some of appellant’s cattle strayed from his premises on to the land of appellee where they ate, trampled and otherwise damaged appellee’s field of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fox v. KoehnigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McKenzie v. NewtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vangilder v. FaulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Vangilder v. FaulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Poole v. GillisonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1953
  4. Favre v. MedlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Oliver v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API