Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Kotek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1913No. Nos. 18,206, 18,207—(52, 53)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Two actions in the district court for Rice county, one by the guardian of Margaret Buckley, incompetent, and the other by Julia Ryan, against the same defendant. The eases were tried together upon stipulated facts before Childress, J., who made findings and ordered judgments in favor of plaintiff. Erom orders denying defendant’s motions for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

These two actions, involving the same controversy, were tried together in the court below, resulting in an order for judgment in favor of the plaintiff in each. Defendant appealed from separate-orders denying a new trial.

The facts are as follows: Julia Byan, at the time of the transaction in question, was and still is the owner of the fee title to certain real property, subject to the life estate of Margaret Buckley, who by reason of mental infirmities is incompetent to manage her affairs and was represented by a guardian. In June, 1911, Mrs. Byan, acting in her own behalf, and Joseph C.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dugan v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Perine v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Scheland v. ErpeldingOregon Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parrish v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Rebne v. RebneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Haugland v. Mapleview Lounge & Bottleshop, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Vadnais v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Gerhart v. QuirkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API