Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Lea

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1952No. 3432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In. his application for rehearing counsel for. the defendant and appellee herein complains we cited no authorities, nor did he know of any adjudicated case to support our statement in the opinion herein that [55 So.2d 3]: “Whether or not the objection to the testimony of Gillum was well taken, the defendant, by his' action in offering his wife as a witness, without qualification and in proceeding to examine her on the subject matter testified to by Mr. Gillum without reservation of his previous objection, waived and abandoned his objection to the testimony of Mr. Gillum and his testimony has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hope v. GordonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Jenkins v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Cockerham v. PerotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Acosta v. LeaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. BennettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Combs v. Hartford Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Lapuyade v. Rawbar, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. David Pizzati v. Ds Services of America, Inc. and Safety National Casualty CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API