Legal Opinion

Medrano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 2016No. 4D15-1775PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORST, J..Appellant Samuel Medrano was found guilty of burglary of a dwelling, possession of burglary tools, and grand theft of a motor vehicle under sections 810.02, 810.06, and 812.014, Florida Statutes (2013). He was sentenced to fifteen years in prison. Appellant raises three issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in denying *414Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the grand theft of a motor vehicle charge; (2) the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury on the definition of the words “motor vehicle”; and (3) the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Krause v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Small v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-02.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-06.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. Morlas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2018-06Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-09Supreme Court of Florida · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API