Medrano v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FORST, J..Appellant Samuel Medrano was found guilty of burglary of a dwelling, possession of burglary tools, and grand theft of a motor vehicle under sections 810.02, 810.06, and 812.014, Florida Statutes (2013). He was sentenced to fifteen years in prison. Appellant raises three issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in denying *414Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the grand theft of a motor vehicle charge; (2) the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury on the definition of the words “motor vehicle”; and (3) the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Krause v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Small v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-02.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-06.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Morlas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2018-06Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-09Supreme Court of Florida · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.