Legal Opinion

Purcell v. City of Lexington

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 14, 1919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke —

Affirming

The appellants are the present owners of the interest which the city of Lexington, as the fee simple owner of four lots on Main and Water streets in the city of Lexington, demised in 1839 to Thomas K. Layton and Michael G-aug'h by four separate leases which are identical in termsi, and one of which, omitting’ the description of the property leased and certificates of acknowledgment and recordation, is as follows:

"This indenture made and entered into this 13th day of February, 1839, between the city of Lexington, of the one part, and Thomas K.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. J. W. Perry Co. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Wells v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Raydure v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Wolfe County v. BeckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Clark v. Louisville Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cty. Govern.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fayette County Board of Supervisors v. O'RearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. Elkhorn Piney Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Kentucky Department of Revenue v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kentucky Tax Commission v. Jefferson Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API