Legal Opinion
Badgley v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 27, 1979No. Nos. 385-389, Dockets 78-7196 to 78-7200PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
These actions consolidated for trial, were brought by or in the name of, owners of riparian land situated in Pennsylvania, who claim that the value of their lands along the Delaware River and its West Branch was diminished by the City of New York’s impoundment, diversion and manipulation of the headwaters of the Delaware River for the City’s public water supply purposes. The City’s answer admitted that it impounds and diverts the Delaware waters and that it manipulates the flow of the river. The City contended, however, that these acts were authorized by the U.S.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Olin Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Ouellette v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1985
- Hudson River Fishermen's Ass'n v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.